This doctoral dissertation investigates the dual operational capacity of Sport for Development and Peace (SDP) initiatives within the protracted Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It critically evaluates whether SDP serves as an authentic instrument for reconciliation, peacebuilding, and structural dialogue, or whether it operates as a form of sportswashing, legitimizing existing power asymmetries and political status quos. Grounded in Gordon Allport’s Contact Hypothesis, the study examines how traditional contact conditions (equal status, common goals, intergroup cooperation, and institutional support) function when applied within deep-rooted, asymmetric ethno-political conflicts. To address the limitations of classic contact models in prolonged conflict settings, this research introduces the Re-Contact Framework, a theoretical and practical model designed to move beyond superficial intergroup interaction toward structural conflict transformation, critical self-reflection, and sustained relational engagement. Utilizing a qualitative multi-case study methodology, the research explores institutional dynamics, participant perspectives, and policy frameworks across diverse SDP programs in the region. The findings demonstrate that without addressing core power imbalances and structural inequalities, standard contact initiatives risk serving as mere facades of normalization. Ultimately, this study provides actionable recommendations for reframing sports initiatives through the Re-Contact Framework to foster genuine conflict transformation, mutual accountability, and sustainable grassroots peacebuilding in divided societies.
Reconciliation or Sports-Washing? Evaluating the Dual Role of Sport for Development and Peace Initiatives in the Israeli-Palestinian Context - Identifier: 6987
Internal display of the 6987 entity interconnections (Node labels correspond to identifiers)
